National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2013  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81--83

Odontogenic myxoma


Suchitra Gupta1, Neeraj Grover1, Ajit Kadam2, Shally Gupta3, Kunal Sah1, JD Sunitha1,  
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Teerthankar Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Rajasthan Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dr. HSJ Dental College and Institute, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Suchitra Gupta
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Teerthankar Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
India

Abstract

Odontogenic myxoma is a rare intraosseous neoplasm, which is benign but locally aggressive. It rarely appears in any bone other than the jaws. It is considered to be derived from the mesenchymal portion of the tooth germ. Clinically, it is a slow-growing, expansile, painless, non-metastasizing, central tumor of jaws, chiefly the mandible. Here we report the case of a typical odontogenic myxoma in a 26-year-old female patient, which had acquired large dimensions and involved the entire left half of the mandible including the ramus, resulting in a gross facial deformity, within a span of one and a half years.



How to cite this article:
Gupta S, Grover N, Kadam A, Gupta S, Sah K, Sunitha J D. Odontogenic myxoma.Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4:81-83


How to cite this URL:
Gupta S, Grover N, Kadam A, Gupta S, Sah K, Sunitha J D. Odontogenic myxoma. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 29 ];4:81-83
Available from: https://www.njms.in/text.asp?2013/4/1/81/117879


Full Text

 Introduction



Soft tissue myxomas are frequently found, but their intraosseous counterparts are rarely encountered, and those that are found are almost exclusively confined to the jaws. [1] Very few intraosseous myxomas have been found in locations other than the jaws, as reported in the clavicle by Stout et al. [2] or in ribs, [3] or femur, [4] but most of the investigators have found that the intraosseous myxomas are most commonly found in jaws and are odontogenic in origin. [2],[5],[6]

The odontogenic myxoma was first described by Thoma and Goldman in 1947. [1] Of all the biopsies submitted, odontogenic tumors comprise about 1.3%, while of all the odontogenic tumors, odontogenic myxoma contributes only 3-11%. [7],[8]

Odontogenic myxoma most frequently occurs in second or third decades of life, [7],[9] has a slight female predilection, [7],[10] and involves the mandible more commonly than the maxilla. [5],[9] Clinically, it is a slow-growing, expansile, painless tumor, which may cause root resorption, tooth mobility, bone expansion, cortical destruction and facial distortion. [5],[11] Radiographically, the classic presentation is that of a multilocular radiolucency, with well-developed locules, consisting of fine trabeculae, arranged at right angles, known as the 'Tennis-racquet' or 'Step-ladder' pattern. A 'sun-ray' or 'sun-burst' appearance has also been reported in the literature. [12],[13] On gross examination, the surgical specimen is characteristically loose, slippery or gelatinous in nature. Histopathologically, the lesion consists of loosely arranged spindle, stellate-shaped or round cells, in an abundant myxoid stroma. [6],[13]

We report this case in order to put forth a typical case of a rare benign tumor, i.e., odontogenic myxoma in a 26-year-old female, which grew to involve quite a large portion of the mandible, within a short span of one and a half years.

 Case Report



A 26-year-old female patient reported with the chief complaint of a painless gradually progressive swelling in the lower left side of face, which was initially noticed as a small swelling in the lower left vestibule and grew to the present size within a span of one and a half years. There was no history of trauma. Past medical and dental histories were non-contributory.

Extra-oral examination revealed a diffuse, non-tender, bony hard swelling of the left body region of mandible, approx. 3-4 cm in size [Figure 1]. No local rise in temperature or change in color of the overlying skin was seen. No lymphadenopathy was observed.{Figure 1}

On intra-oral examination, a single well-defined localized swelling at left buccal as well as lingual vestibular region, extending from 34 to 37 region, with displacement of 35, 36 and mobility of 34, 35, 36 and 37, was observed. There was no erythema, ulceration or pus discharge in the overlying mucosa [Figure 2].{Figure 2}

Radiographically, the Orthopantomograph (OPG) showed a multilocular radiolucency, extending antero-posteriorly from the midline to left ramus region, and supero-inferiorly from the alveolar process to the lower border of the mandible. Poorly defined radiolucent lesion causing slight cortical expansion, with fine trabeculae, some intersecting at right angles, were evident. Displacement of 34, 35, 36, root resorption of 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 as well as scalloping between the roots of the involved teeth, was also apparent [Figure 3].{Figure 3}

The lesion was biopsied and submitted to the Department of Oral Pathology with the provisional diagnosis of ameloblastoma or odontogenic keratocyst (OKC).

On macroscopic examination, the biopsy specimen was in multiple pieces, 1-2 cm in size, whitish in color, transparent and slippery in nature and soft in consistency. On microscopic examination, H and E stained section revealed loosely arranged stellate-shaped cells with intermingled fibrillar processes in a homogenous mucoid ground substance with few collagen fibrils and capillaries [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. Very few scattered odontogenic epithelial rests, areas of hemorrhage, and foci of bony trabeculae were visible. Odontogenic myxoma was the definitive diagnosis.{Figure 4}{Figure 5}

 Discussion



Odontogenic myxoma is a rare benign intraosseous neoplasm, which is called 'locally malignant' on account of its exceptionally high local aggressiveness, high recurrence rate and non-metastasizing nature.

Zimmerman et al. reported that the average age for the odontogenic myxoma is 26.5 years, although majority of the investigators found that this lesion occurs in second or third decade of life. [2] Most of the reports suggest that there is a slight female preponderance, mandibular predilection, and the lesion has a silent locally destructive nature. [2],[5],[8],[14] All these features were evident in our case. Our case, though a benign tumor, was a highly aggressive lesion, involving almost half of the mandible within a short span of one and a half years. Another interesting finding was that it did not cause much of a cortical expansion or facial deformity and appeared to be invading the bone antero-posteriorly, as well as displayed scalloping between the roots of the involved teeth, in much the same manner as an odontogenic keratocyst.

Radiographically, the appearance of an odontogenic myxoma may vary from a unilocular radiolucency to a multilocular lesion, with a well-defined to diffuse margin. However, a unilocular appearance is more common among children and in anterior parts of the jaws. In tooth-bearing areas, the tumor is often scalloped between the roots and root resorption may occur, thus giving a false appearance of an OKC. [15] However, the classical radiographic features of the odontogenic myxoma, where the bony trabeculae of a multilocular radiolucency intersect at right angles and the lesion causes root resorption, resulting in tooth mobility, [2],[5],[10] were readily identifiable in our case. The typical soft, slippery and gelatinous nature of the specimen on macroscopic examination [6],[13] and the histopathological findings were also in accordance with the literature. [2],[5],[6],[11] Thus our case was a prototype of an odontogenic myxoma.

However, in case of mixed clinical features, a differential diagnosis must be established with other clinically similar entities like simple cysts, ameloblastoma, OKC, intraosseous hemangioma and giant cell granuloma. [16]

The cause and histogenesis of the tumor remain controversial, but the tissue of origin is considered mesenchymal. Two theories of origin have been proposed. Firstly, the tumor results from myxomatous degeneration of fibrous stroma. [6] Secondly, it is derived from the mesenchymal portion of the tooth germ i.e., the dental papilla, follicle or periodontal ligament (PDL). [11],[17]

 Conclusion



On the basis of its common site of occurrence (tooth-bearing areas of jaws), usual age of occurrence and gender predilection (second or third decade and female predilection), the striking histological resemblance to dental mesenchyme, and the sporadic presence of odontogenic epithelial islands, the WHO and many authorities consider this neoplasm to be of odontogenic mesenchymal origin. [1],[9],[11] Our case also seems to fall in the same category, as all the criteria are duly fulfilled.

References

1Li TJ, Sun LS, Luo HY. Odontogenic myxoma: A clinicopathological study of 25 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1799-806.
2Zimmerman DC, Dahlin DC. Myxomatous tumors of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1958;11:1069-80.
3Pansecchi V. Considerations and findings concerning a case of myxoma of the ribs. Minerva Ortop 1967;18:674-9.
4Chacha PB, Tan KK. Periosteal myxoma of femur. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 1972;54:1091-4.
5Adekeye EO, Avery BS, Edwards MB, Williams HK . Advanced central myxoma of the jaws in Nigeria: Clinical features, treatment, and pathogenesis. Int J Oral Surg 1984;13:177-86.
6Stewart SS, Baum SM, Arlen M, Elguezabal A. Myxoma of the lower jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:800-8.
7Regezi JA, Donald AK, Richard MC, Arbor A. Odontogenic tumors- Analysis of 706 cases. J Oral Surg 1978;36:771-8.
8Odukoya O. Odontogenic tumors: Analysis of 289 Nigerian cases. J Oral Pathol Med 1995;24:454-7.
9Rajendran R, Sivapathasundaram B. Shafer's textbook of oral pathology. 5 th ed. USA: Elsevier Science; 2006. p. 413-6.
10Kangur TT, Dahlin CD, Turlington EG. Myxomatous tumors of the jaws. J Oral Surg 1975;33:523-8.
11Dezotti MS, Azevedo LR, Fontao FN, Capelozza AL, Santana E. Odontogenic myxoma: A case report and clinico-radiographic study of 7 tumors. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:117-24.
12Langlais RP, Langland OE, Lortje PJ. Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. USA: Williams and Wilkins Waverly Company Ltd; 1995. p. 722-4.
13Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouguot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2 nd ed. Pennysylvania: WB Saunders Company Ltd.; 2004. p. 635-7.
14Barros RE, Dominguez FV, Cabrini RL. Myxoma of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:225-36.
15Wood NK, Goaz PW. Differential diagnosis of oral lesions. St Louis: Mosby; 1987. p. 543-5.
16Reddy SP, Naag A, Kashyap B. Odontogenic myxoma: Report of 2 cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2010;1:183-6.
17Farman GA, Nortje CJ, Grotepass Fw, Farman FJ, Zyl JAV. Myxofibroma of the jaws. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1977;15:3-18.