|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 244-249
Knowledge and awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in the adult population in North India: A hospital-based study
Abhinav Jha1, Vinit Aher2, Preeti Lath3, Monica Khangembam3, Nishant4, Pooja Pani5, Ujwal Singh6
1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sarjug Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India
2 Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Periodontics, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
5 Department of Pedodontics, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
6 Consultant Dental Surgeon, Uttarakhand, India
|Date of Submission||03-Apr-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||04-Jan-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||15-Jul-2021|
Dr. Ujwal Singh
Consultant Dental Surgeon, Uttarakhand
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Implantology is an emerging field of science, although there are not many subjects who opt for this treatment modality. Replacement of missing or lost teeth with dental prostheses supported by oral implants has been accepted and received positive evaluations from patients who have undergone implant treatment. Today, implant-supported restorations can be considered the treatment of choice from the perspective of occlusal support, preservation of adjacent teeth, and avoidance of a removable partial denture. Currently, dental implants are widely accepted as a prosthetic treatment of completely or partially edentulous patients. This led to widespread acceptance and popularity of dental implants within the dental professional community.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and awareness of dental implants in residents of Uttarakhand.
Materials and Methods: A total population of 500 subjects were randomly selected and evaluated based on filled questionnaire responses.
Results: A low level of knowledge was observed on analyzing the filled responses among the studied population.
Conclusion: General public should be made aware on dental implants as treatment modality along with the focus on increasing the cost feasibility.
Keywords: Attitude, awareness, dental implants, knowledge
|How to cite this article:|
Jha A, Aher V, Lath P, Khangembam M, Nishant, Pani P, Singh U. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in the adult population in North India: A hospital-based study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2021;12:244-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Jha A, Aher V, Lath P, Khangembam M, Nishant, Pani P, Singh U. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in the adult population in North India: A hospital-based study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 29];12:244-9. Available from: https://www.njms.in/text.asp?2021/12/2/244/321450
| Introduction|| |
Dental implants have been mainly advocated for usage among edentulous subjects owing to better stability and retention of dentures, improved functioning, and quality of life. However, nowadays, they are used as prosthesis for the replacement of missing teeth in both partially and completely edentulous individuals. Their wide acceptance among treated subjects has been reported by various authors. Dental implants are preferred for prosthetic replacement due to better quality of life, self-confidence, self-assurance, and conservation of adjacent tooth.
Dental implants are surgically placed within the jaw bone in order to act as a support for single tooth replacement or as fixed or partial prosthesis and maxillofacial prosthesis. Their success is dependent on the integration of implants with surrounding osseous tissues. The osteointegration is dependent on material, quantity, and quality of bone and conditions affecting the loading of implants.
According to Grogono et al. (1989), 88% of implant subjects demonstrated an increase in confidence following treatment with implants, while 89% were willing to undergo the procedure again. Furthermore, 98% of implant-treated subjects reported an improvement in overall oral health. Awareness levels among implant-treated subjects have been found to vary among various populations. Salonen in their study reported from Finland (1999) demonstrated only 29% awareness among the general population about implant dentistry, while Best from Australia (1993) reported 64% awareness. Al-Johany et al. in their study showed that 61.5% of study participants favored implant prosthesis, whereas 35.2% and 3.3% preferred fixed partial and removable dentures, respectively. Most of the study subjects preferred fixed prosthetic replacement over removable dentures due to the following reasons – (a) comfort (43.7% cases), (b) natural looking (41.3%), (c) increased masticatory capacity (35.7%), and (d) ease in communication and speech (25.4%). Major deterrent factor in choosing dental implant prosthesis in higher cost. On judging knowledge level among subjects, 78.8% preferred implant placement by specialists, while only 21.2% opted for regular dental practitioners for the procedure.
A questionnaire is a method of self-administered data collection. Various limitations of this method are its tediousness, collection, and organization of data; transfer, sharing, and replication process that may be leading to multiple errors. Furthermore, web-based questionnaires carry the risk of maintaining the confidentiality of data.
Aim and objectives of this study were
- Evaluation of knowledge level among the studied population regarding dental implants
- Evaluation of information sources on dental implants
- Evaluation of acceptance of dental implants as treatment modality with comparison to other conventional techniques.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a self-explanatory questionnaire-based survey conducted on 500 subjects visiting the Dental Outpatient Department of a Community Health Center in Uttarakhand. The questionnaire was based on five questions in English, Hindi, and Punjabi languages. It was designed to evaluate overall awareness and knowledge about dental implants. Subjects belonging to the age range of 16 years and above were selected for the study. The printed questionnaire form was distributed among study participants. Only completely filled forms were considered for completing the survey. Around 30 forms were excluded, thus, finally, filled forms comprising of 470 complete responses were evaluated. The study design was approved by the ethical committee of Uttarakhand Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare Hospital (Reg No.IEC/513/OD/2018).
Survey form used in the study
- Level of education:
- Are you aware of dental implants as a treatment substitute for missing teeth? Yes/No
- From where have you learned about dental implants?
- Print media. For example, newspapers, magazines, etc.
- Audiovisual media like television and radio
- Internet usage.
- Friends and relatives.
- Do you have willingness to choose dental implants as treatment alternatives? Yes/No
- What are the limitations in choosing dental implants?
- Higher cost
- Less knowledge
- Surgical intervention
- Longer treatment time.
| Results|| |
Fifty-two percent of the study group participants were male, while 48% were female subjects. About 46% of study participants belonged to the postgraduate category, while 40% belonged to the undergraduate category. While 15% were illiterate individuals [Graph 1]. About 25% of the study group had knowledge about dental implant treatment [Graph 2]. Around 57% of subjects gained knowledge about implants from family and friends, while 30% obtained information from practicing dentists. Only 15% of the study group had gathered information from the Internet or print media [Graph 3]. 57% did not want implant-based prosthetic replacement due to its higher costs, less knowledge was the second cause (28%), surgical intervention was feared by 47%, and longer treatment time was a drawback for 53% [Table 1] and [Graph 4].
| Discussion|| |
Shalya et al. conducted an outline survey using an 11 questionnaire-based survey on public awareness on dental implants. Most of the subjects obtained knowledge from their dentists, followed by the Internet. 52.2% of the study subjects reported high treatment cost as the biggest deterrent in implant therapy. 45% of individuals termed implant failure as a result of poor maintenance. 25% of the study group agreed for implant-based treatment.
Mously et al., in their analysis on 905 study participants demonstrated that 56% of subjects had low knowledge level regarding dental implants, while 44.4% possessed sound knowledge level on dental implants. Their knowledge level increased with the level of education with maximum awareness on postgraduate degree people. Most of the participants received knowledge regarding dental implants from their family and friends (43% and 42%, respectively.
Sinha et al. conducted a study on 1000 subjects who opted dental implants as treatment choice in Daman, India and found that only 9% of respondents had implant placement, while 17% were well-informed about this treatment option. Here, also dental practitioners played a major role in providing knowledge regarding dental implant availability, followed by the Internet and media.
Rehman in his study on Hyderabad dental patients (n = 450) visiting private dental clinics observed that 62.5% of studied subjects had knowledge concerning dental implants. 87.5% of cases felt that its higher cost is the major reason for people not accepting implant treatment. 56.25% of subjects knew about their placement within the jaw, 56.25% opined their placement in gingival, while 8.75% cases considered their placement in the adjacent tooth, while 13.75% had no idea about the site of placement. 45% of the study group felt that failure of implants may be due to poor oral hygiene, 20% felt that they should be cleaned in a similar manner to natural teeth, whereas 15% were of opinion that they required less care. The main information sources were friends and relatives who constituted 35% of information providers, while dentists comprised only 30% as source of information.
Sakshi et al. in their study on knowledge among undergraduate dental students on dental implants surmised that 99% of the study group had prior knowledge about dental implants which was mainly gathered from audio-visual resources and the Internet which is in contrast to various studies wherein dental professionals played a major role in imparting knowledge on this treatment modality. 55.68% of students reflected a maximum lifespan of 10 years, whereas 18.75% and 26.7% of subjects reported a lifespan of 10–20 years and having no knowledge about this, respectively. Here, also implant cost was a major factor in impending implants as a treatment option.
Dental surgeons are oral health educators and define treatment choices which are dependent on skill and facilities available. Fixed implant prosthesis provides improved swallowing and better oral habits.
According to Nazar et al., 61% of study participants were aware about dental implants, while 39% showed a lack of any information on them. Sources of information in decreasing order include dental practitioners (38%), friends (33%), media (26%), and reading material (3%).
Baqar et al. conducted a study in patients (n = 380) to determine awareness and their attitude toward implant-supported prosthesis. Only 9.8% of the study group had awareness on dental implants. The level of awareness was found to have a statistical increase along with the level of education (P = 0) as well as occupational levels (P = 0.01). The main source of information on dental implants were relatives and friends (40.5%). 5.2% of subjects reported higher cost as a major deterrent toward opting dental implants as treatment modality. 73% of study participants demonstrated no knowledge on dental implants.
Kinani et al. used a 14-question-based study on the assessment of patient's awareness, expectation, and knowledge level regarding dental implants on 380 study participants divided into medical and nonmedical groups. These investigators found 85% and 71% knowledge regarding missing tooth replacement in both groups, respectively. Dentists were the primary source of information for both the study groups (43.3% and 34.8%, respectively). Approximately 60% to 70% of subjects feel that implant placement should be performed only by specialists. Around 52% to 77% of study participants placed the site of the implant to the jaw bone. 49.7% and 36.6% of subjects in medical and nonmedical groups, respectively, felt that implants require more care, while 13.7% and 16.7% of subjects cleaned their implant restorations in a manner similar to natural dentition.
Mayya et al. in their questionnaire-based study involving 242 study participants belonging to Mangalore, Karnataka, India, reported that only 17.8% population had awareness on dental implants as the choice of treatment. Of these, 69.8% obtained knowledge through friends and family, while 28.1% obtained it from dentists. This study showed extremely less awareness and/or knowledge regarding dental implants in the studied group.
Ajayi et al. in their questionnaire-based study in the Nigerian population demonstrated that major information on dental implants was provided by dental health practitioners (41.5%) which were followed by gathering information from friends who constituted 17.7% of the study group. Only 14.6% of subjects showed knowledge regarding dental implants, while 35% of study respondents had no know how on dental implants. Furthermore, individuals with higher educational levels possessed greater knowledge on implants. Furthermore, higher costs and surgical requirements were major disadvantages involving implant treatment. Subjects preferred implants for anterior teeth replacement than posterior teeth. Although, a lower awareness level was observed even in higher educational level respondents. Furthermore, implant-based prosthetic replacement was not preferred due to higher costs and need for surgical intervention.
Mathuriya and Agarwal in their questionnaire-based study among dental patients belonging to Bhopal showed that just 32.5% of the study subjects had awareness regarding dental implants as a treatment modality and most of them had no knowledge regarding the procedure involved along with the advantages and disadvantages of using dental implants.
Kumar and Chauhan in their assessment of knowledge and awareness regarding dental implant use among 620 Indore, India based subjects found that only 25.8% of the study cohort had knowledge of dental implants. Choice of implants as a treatment option was largely based on their esthetic advantage (70%). On the other hand, 70% also did not want implant-supported prosthetic replacement due to their high cost.
Hosadurga et al. conducted a two-stage study in which the first phase comprised 106 subjects whose attitude, knowledge, and awareness toward dental implant treatment were assessed. The second phase was conducted after educating these subjects about implants using interactive audiovisual aids. It was seen that knowledge deficits regarding dental implants were widely distributed before providing information.
Gbadebo et al. in their 6-month study over 220 Nigerian study participants found that 71.1% of the cohort were completely unaware regarding dental implants, while only 28.9% knew about this treatment availability. 22.6% of study participants opted for implant-based prosthesis, while 13.3% were against this treatment method. On the other hand, 61.9% were not sure about this treatment modality. 68% of the participants attributed dental professionals as the primary source of information regarding dental implants, followed by other resources such as audiovisual media, the Internet, and peer group.
Pommer et al. have reported from the Austrian population 79% desirability for dental implant treatment. Chowdhary et al. reported only 23.24% awareness in their study. Numerous investigators have presented variations in data all around the world regarding knowledge, attitude, and overall awareness on dental implants.,,,, Kohli et al., in their awareness analysis among the Malaysian population reported that only 27% of respondents had moderate amount of information about dental implants. Dentists themselves were the main information source which was followed by audiovisual media and friend aid. On overall conclusion, 56% of study participants had both knowledge and awareness regarding dental implant treatment.
| Conclusion|| |
The practice of implant dentistry is presently emerging throughout the world, but there is a huge gap between the popularity of dental implants and the evidence available for the same. Clearly, there is a need for dental implant education among the Indian population to increase their knowledge and proficiency in dental implant dentistry. This can be attributed to variations in educational levels, socioeconomic status, and degree of interactions with oral health-care professionals, friends, and family. In the present study, more than half of the participants were not having information regarding dental implants. It shows that there is a need for providing more information to the patients about this treatment modality. Hence, dental education is necessary for developing positive attitude among the population regarding dental implants.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients' awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2010;22:183-8.
Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan J. Patient's awareness and attitude towards dental implants. Ind J Dent 2015;6:167-71.
Ismail MB. Knowledge of patients towards dental implants in Karnataka, India. Int J Oral Care Res 2017;5:102-4.
Nazar AM, Issa MI, Abdulkareem MA, Abdulkareem MA, Mohammad JA. Removable denture patient awareness towards dental implants. Int J Sci Res 2018;7:216-9.
Hosadurga R, Tenneti S, Hegde S, Kashyap RS, Kumar A. Awareness, knowledge and attitude of patients toward dental implants: A web-based questionnaire study. J Dent Implant 2015;5:93-100. [Full text]
Shalya R, Reddy PV, Rani KR, Prasanna JS. Assessment of public awareness towards dental implants using web-based survey technique. Galore Int J Health Sci Res 2020;5:38-46.
Mously HA, Badeeb BJ, Bahbishi NA, Mzain WM, Naguib GH, Hamed MT. Knowledge and attitude toward replacing missing teeth with dental implants among the Saudi population. J Orthod Sci 2020;9:5.
Sinha M, Agarwal M, shah SS, Desai S, Desai A, Champaneri H. Constraints among patients while opting dental implant as a treatment option. Int J Oral Care Res 2019;7:8-11. [Full text]
Rehman MS. Awareness and knowledge of dental implants as an option for replacing missing teeth: A survey in Hyderabad, India. Int J Contem Med Res 2019;6:E1-3.
Sakshi, Makkar P, Yadav A, Bajaj P, Sharma K. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants among undergraduate dental students. IP Ann Prosthodont Res Dent 2018;4:6-8.
Mgbeokwere U, Okoye L, Ekwueme O. A survey of the knowledge of dental implants as a choice in treatment of edentulous jaws among health workers in government dental clinics in Enugu. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2011;1:91-5.
] [Full text]
Baqar A, Hakeem S, Ilyar F, Mohsin A, Hassan F, Javaid F. Awareness regarding implant supported dental prosthesis: A survey in tertiary care set up. JBUMDC 2018;8:250-3.
Kinani HM, Hakami ZH, Al-Amri IA, Maree SA, Nahari HH, Ghayti IH, et al
. Awareness and knowledge of the general public at southern region of Saudi Arabia regarding dental implants. J Int Med Dent 2018;5:63-71.
Mayya A, D'Souza J, George AM, Shenoy K, Jodalli P, Mayya SS. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in adult population in South India: A hospital-based study. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:263-7.
] [Full text]
Ajayi YO, Akinboboye BO, Dosumu OO, Akeredolu PA. Awareness of dental implant among dental patients in Nigeria. JMBR 2016;15:40-8.
Mathuriya S, Agarwal S. To study awareness of patients about implant and willingness for implant. J Appl Dent Med Sci 2015;1:10-9.
Kumar S, Chauhan A. Knowledge and awareness of dental implants in Indore: An exploratory study. Int J Oral health Med Res 2015;2:29-33.
Gbadebo US, Lawal FB, Sulaiman AO, Ajayi DM. Dental implants as an option for tooth replacement: The awareness of patients at a tertiary hospital in a developing country. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:302-7.
] [Full text]
Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patient's mindset on dental implants I: Level of information sources, sources of information and need for patient infection. Clin Oral Impla Res 2011;22:223-9.
Chowdhary R, Mankani N, Chandraker NK. Awareness of dental implants as a treatment choice in urban Indian populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:305-8.
Thanish Ahmed S. Awareness of dental implants on general population. J Pharm Sci Res 2016;8:632-4.
Sharma A, Chaudhari BK, Shrestha B, Suwal P, Parajuli PK, Singh RK, et al
. Knowledge and perception about dental implants among undergraduate dental students. BDJ Open 2019;5:1-6.
Ozturkn HP, Ozgedik HS, Avsever H, Kurt MH, Senel B, Piskin B, et al
. Awareness, attitude and knowledge of dental patients regarding dental implant treatment in an urban population: A cross-sectional study in Turkey. J Stoma 2019;72:112-7.
Hareem F, Yadalam U, Narayan ST, Apoorva M, Sheetal S. Awareness and knowledge among the general population about dental implants as an option in replacing missing tooth- A questionnaire survey (in Bangalore). Int J Sci Res 2018;7:48-50.
Esfahani OF, Moosali F. Awareness and knowledge of patients toward dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Kerman, Iran. J Periodontal Implant Dent 2016;8:43-8.