Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Search | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
 
Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 193
 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 43-46  

A statistical analysis of incidence, etiology, and management of palatal fistula


Department of Plastic Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Date of Submission17-May-2018
Date of Acceptance29-Sep-2018
Date of Web Publication07-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sheerin Shah
Department of Plastic Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana - 141 012, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_42_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Objective: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the incidence, profile, and the management of palatal fistula occurring in patients operated for cleft palate in our institute.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all cleft palatal fistula patients who presented during the period from August 2007 to October 2017, to classify their site, age of presentation, surgery performed, and outcome. A record of the type of cleft palate and previous palatoplasty was also obtained. The outcome in terms of incidence and fistula formation depending on Veau's classification was analyzed.
Results: Twenty-two patients reported with palatal fistula during this period. The incidence of fistula formation of our institute was 9.6%. Incisive foramen (13/22) was the most common site of fistula formation. Among various techniques used, local and buccal flaps were found to be useful in a maximum number of cases (14/22). The rate of fistula recurrence was 18.2% (4/22). On retrospective analysis of our institutional data, it was found that the incidence of cleft palate fistula was significantly higher in clefts with Veau Types III and IV (13/18) as compared to Veau Types I and II (5/18).
Conclusion: This study shows that the fistula rate of our institution was 9.6%. Complete clefts (unilateral or bilateral) involving both primary and secondary palates predispose more to fistula formation.

Keywords: Cleft palate statistics, flaps for palatal fistula, palatal fistula incidence, palatal fistula repair, palatoplasty


How to cite this article:
Garg R, Shah S, Uppal S, Mittal RK. A statistical analysis of incidence, etiology, and management of palatal fistula. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2019;10:43-6

How to cite this URL:
Garg R, Shah S, Uppal S, Mittal RK. A statistical analysis of incidence, etiology, and management of palatal fistula. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 21];10:43-6. Available from: http://www.njms.in/text.asp?2019/10/1/43/259831




   Introduction Top


Fistula, defined as an epithelized opening between the oral and nasal cavities,[1] is the most common complication of palatoplasty (single or two staged). Various causes for its formation are attributed to age of primary palatoplasty, width of cleft, type of cleft, associated syndrome, and surgeon's experience.

Worldwide, the fistula rate ranges from 0% to 58%, with recurrence rate of 33%.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Small asymptomatic fistulae are initially managed conservatively as they may close themselves without any bothersome symptoms. Symptomatic fistulae with features such as hypernasal speech or nasal regurgitation of meals should be taken up for repair anytime after 6 weeks of palatoplasty.

Numerous surgical techniques for repair of these fistulae have been described that aim to achieve either normal development of speech or adequate maxillary growth in later years.[6],[7]

This is a retrospective analysis of cleft palate fistulae presenting to our department from a population of patients operated for palatoplasty in our hospital and to highlight the review of literature for the same.


   Materials and Methods Top


We analyzed the presentation and management of palatal fistulae presenting to our institute in the period from August 2007 to October 2017. We did not include patients who either presented early or had postoperative asymptomatic fistula that healed itself within 6 weeks. Intentional fistulae, which fall in Pittsburgh Type 6 and 7, were also not included. In this period, a total of 22 patients presented with symptomatic fistulae. These patients were classified according to the type of fistula as per the Pittsburgh classification. Speech and assessment of other symptoms were done before repair of all fistulae. The type of fistula repair and postoperative stay were recorded. All operated patients were followed up at a regular interval of 2 weeks for the first 2 months and then monthly for the next 4 months for any recurrence or other complications. These 22 patients were retrospectively analyzed for their prior palatoplasty, in terms of type of Veau cleft, type of palatoplasty done, gender distribution, and laterality of cleft.

The data thus collected were analyzed using Pearson's X2 and Fisher's exact tests. The difference of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


We studied 22 patients, who presented with palatal fistulae during this period. The most common age group of patients presenting was <5 years [Table 1]. There was no gender difference in the occurrence of fistula. Pittsburgh Type 5 fistulae were significantly higher than other types [Table 1]. Among various techniques used for fistula closure, local and buccal flaps were most commonly used. All patients were followed up fortnightly for the first 2 months and monthly for the next 4 months. There were four cases of recurrent fistula, all occurring in the area of incisive foramen (recurrence rate 18.2%). Speech analysis of all operated cases showed a decrease in nasal resonance.
Table 1: Details of palatal fistula patients

Click here to view


On retrospective analysis of institutional data, we found that the total number of cleft palates operated during this time was 228, of which 22 patients developed fistulae. The fistula rate of our institution was 9.6%. [Table 2] shows the occurrence of fistula in each Veau group of cleft palate, a significantly higher number of which were found in Veau Types III and IV. The mean age of primary palatoplasty was 1.6 years, and 2-flap palatoplasty technique was used in 68.2% of these fistula patients.
Table 2: Occurrence of fistula in each Veau group of cleft palate

Click here to view


Surgical technique

In our institution, single-staged palatoplasty was routinely done, except in rare cases where the width of the palate is too large, in which soft palate was closed in the first stage. As a standard procedure, the nasal layer was sutured with Vicryl 4-0. Intravelar veloplasty was done in all cases under magnification using Vicryl 3-0. The oral layer was sutured with Vicryl 3-0. Packs, if placed along lateral incisions, were removed on the 4th postoperative day. Most of the patients were discharged after pack removal.


   Discussion Top


The surgery for cleft palate has evolved from simple paring of edges to raising soft tissue flaps to doing intravelar veloplasty. Despite surgical advances over the years, poor speech outcome and fistula occurrence remain the causes of concern for cleft surgeons. Palatal fistula (defined as patency between oral and nasal cavity) is a well-known complication of palatoplasty.[1] They may be symptomatic or asymptomatic. Symptomatic fistulae are the ones that present with nasal regurgitation and hypernasality in speech. The incidence may range from as low as 12% to as high as 45%.[2] The review of literature suggests a highly variable incidence rate.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Sadhu, in his study in 2009,[8] mentioned fistula rate of <1%. Carstens reported an incidence of 58% in his article.[9] In a study by Muzaffar et al., the incidence rate was 8.7%, with recurrence rate being 33%.[7] Our institutional fistula rate was 9.6% and the recurrence rate was 18.2%. The attributable factors for this wide range of incidence could be the surgical techniques used, the severity of the cleft, and the timing of repair.[10],[11],[12] In this study, gender as a variable in determining the incidence of palatal fistula was not a contributory factor. Emory et al. in their study on 119 cleft palate patients also did not find gender as a contributory factor to palatal fistula.[6] There were 104 patients with Veau Type II, of which 6 had fistula. There were 69 patients in Veau Type III, of which 12 (17.3%) had fistula, and there were 21 patients in Veau Type IV, of which 4 (19%) had fistula. In this study, the incidence of fistula was directly proportional to the severity of cleft. Amaratunga[12] and Lithovius et al.[13] also found a correlation between cleft type and fistula occurrence. Amirize[14] found higher fistula rate in Veau Type III clefts than in Veau Type II (11 and 8, respectively). He found a direct correlation between cleft width and risk of oronasal fistula, with high fistula rates in patients with wide cleft >15 mm. Similar direct correlation between the both has also been documented by other authors.[15],[16],[17] Contrary to this, Wilhelmi et al.[18] and Mak et al.[19] did not find any correlation between cleft width and fistula occurrence. In this study, we did not record the width of the cleft in cleft palate patients. Lithovius et al.[20] depicted no significant association between the type of palatoplasty and occurrence of fistula. Our study showed a significantly higher occurrence of fistula in 2-flap palatoplasty patients. Similar results were reported by Cohen et al.[4]

We could not demonstrate any association between timing of primary surgery and fistula formation as we could retrospectively analyze only 22 patients who underwent palatoplasty at a mean age of 1.6 years. On review of literature, no clear-cut association was depicted by authors like Cohen et al.,[4] whereas Emory et al.[6] demonstrated a decrease in fistula rate if palatoplasty was done in <12 months. The most common site of fistula in this study was incisive foramen. Difficulty in dissecting anterior palate (especially nasal layer) and inability in achieving watertight closure are prime causative factors of fistula in this area. Murthy[21] also found incisive foramen as the most common site. The review of literature[22] showed that another common site of fistula formation was junction of hard and soft palates, which was the second common site in this study. The cause of this was attributed to inadequate mobilization, deficiency of tissue, triangular-shaped palatine bones, and a higher incidence of Veau Types III and IV clefts. Depending on scarring, inflammation, and availability of surrounding tissue, the type of flap was decided. We used local flaps [Figure 1] and buccal flaps [Figure 2] in seven cases each. Superiorly based FAMM flap [Figure 3] was done in two cases. Tongue flap was also done in two cases. Murthy[21] reported a similar pattern of the type of surgeries. On follow-up of 6 months, we found recurrent fistula in four of the operated cases of anterior fistulae (Veau Types III and IV). Distant flaps such as temporalis muscle flap and microvascular free flaps have been described in the literature,[23],[24] but are rarely indicated. The use of prosthesis that causes anatomical barrier between nasal and oral lining is reserved for patients who refuse surgical intervention.
Figure 1: Local flap for fistula coverage

Click here to view
Figure 2: Buccal flap used for fistula coverage

Click here to view
Figure 3: FAMM flap for fistula coverage

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Surgery for closure of palatal fistula is both difficult and demanding. Decision on the type of surgery needed to close the fistula depends on the location and availability of local tissues. One is tempted to close small fistula primarily, but size should not be the only criteria on which this decision be based. Local transposition flaps or regional flaps (FAMM, buccal, and tongue flap) are the workhorse flaps for palatal fistula closure. We have had no experience with free flap or distant flap such as temporalis muscle flap.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Smith DM, Vecchione L, Jiang S, Ford M, Deleyiannis FW, Haralam MA, et al. The Pittsburgh fistula classification system: A standardized scheme for the description of palatal fistulas. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007;44:590-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schultz RC. Management and timing of cleft palate fistula repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:739-47.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. The Eurocleft project 1996-2000: Overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:131-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cohen SR, Kalinowski J, LaRossa D, Randall P. Cleft palate fistulas: A multivariate statistical analysis of prevalence, etiology, and surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1041-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rohrich RJ, Rowsell AR, Johns DF, Drury MA, Grieg G, Watson DJ, et al. Timing of hard palatal closure: A critical long-term analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:236-46.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Emory RE Jr., Clay RP, Bite U, Jackson IT. Fistula formation and repair after palatal closure: An institutional perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1535-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Muzaffar AR, Byrd HS, Rohrich RJ, Johns DF, LeBlanc D, Beran SJ, et al. Incidence of cleft palate fistula: An institutional experience with two-stage palatal repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1515-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sadhu P. Oronasal fistula in cleft palate surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2009;42 Suppl:S123-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Carstens MH. Management of palatal fistulae. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:46-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Rohrich RJ, Love EJ, Byrd HS, Johns DF. Optimal timing of cleft palate closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:413-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Landheer JA, Breugem CC, van der Molen AB. Fistula incidence and predictors of fistula occurrence after cleft palate repair: Two-stage closure versus one-stage closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010;47:623-30.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Amaratunga NA. Occurrence of oronasal fistulas in operated cleft palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:834-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lithovius RH, Ylikontiola LP, Harila V, Sándor GK. A descriptive epidemiology study of cleft lip and palate in Northern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:372-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Amirize EE. The relationship between cleft width and oronasal fistula. Niger J Plast Surg 2016;12:4-11.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Landheer JA, Breugem CC, van der Molen AB. Fistula incidence and predictors of fistula occurrence after cleft palate repair: Two-stage closure versus one-stage closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010;47:623-30.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Parwaz MA, Sharma RK, Parashar A, Nanda V, Biswas G, Makkar S, et al. Width of cleft palate and postoperative palatal fistula – Do they correlate? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1559-63.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Moris LM, Kuang A, Milczuk HA, Beaulieu K, Wang T, Brockman J. Does cleft palate width impact success of cleft repair? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:45.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Wilhelmi BJ, Appelt EA, Hill L, Blackwell SJ. Palatal fistulas: Rare with the two-flap palatoplasty repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:315-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mak SY, Wong WH, Or CK, Poon AM. Incidence and cluster occurrence of palatal fistula after furlow palatoplasty by a single surgeon. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:55-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lithovius RH, Ylikontiola LP, Sándor GK. Incidence of palatal fistula formation after primary palatoplasty in Northern Finland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;118:632-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Murthy J. Descriptive study of management of palatal fistula in one hundred and ninety-four cleft individuals. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:41-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Lu Y, Shi B, Zheng Q, Hu Q, Wang Z. Incidence of palatal fistula after palatoplasty with levator veli palatini retropositioning according to Sommerlad. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;48:637-40.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Krimmel M, Hoffmann J, Reinert S. Cleft palate fistula closure with a mucosal prelaminated lateral upper arm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:1870-2.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Schwabegger AH, Hubli E, Rieger M, Gassner R, Schmidt A, Ninkovic M. Role of free-tissue transfer in the treatment of recalcitrant palatal fistulae among patients with cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1131-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed130    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded54    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal