Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Search | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
 
Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 82
 


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 99-101  

KGMC incision: New approach for exposure of body of mandible


Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences­, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication9-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
U S Pal
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences­, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.102179

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Pal U S, Mohammad S, Singh R K, Singh V, Singh N, Malkunje LR. KGMC incision: New approach for exposure of body of mandible. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2012;3:99-101

How to cite this URL:
Pal U S, Mohammad S, Singh R K, Singh V, Singh N, Malkunje LR. KGMC incision: New approach for exposure of body of mandible. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jul 24];3:99-101. Available from: http://www.njms.in/text.asp?2012/3/1/99/102179

Sir,

The intraoral approach to expose the body of mandible­ is procedure of choice. As noted, we also manage fractures of the posterior body, angle, and rarnus with intraoral approaches, but these more posterior fractures­ require increased commitment interms of time, expertise­, and equipment. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]

One advantage of this approach is the ability to constantly­ access the dental occlusion during surgery. The greatest benefit to the patient is the hidden intraoral scar. The approach is also relatively rapid and simple although access is limited in some regions, such as the lower border of the mandible.

The major concern with using intraoral approaches for mandibular fractures is lower lip numbness from injury to the mental nerve. Temporary hyposthesia is common, related to traction, and resolves.

The only neurovascular structure of any significance that must be negotiated during procedures in the mandibular­ body/symphysis region is the mental neurovascular­ bundle. The artery and vein that accompany­ the mental nerve are insignificant from a surgical standpoint. The mental nerve is a terminal branch of inferior alveolar nerve (mandibular nerve), and is sensory­ to the skin and mucosa of lower lip, the skin in the region of chin, and the facial gingiva of anterior teeth.

The mental nerve exits the mental foramen that is located­ midway between the alveolar and basal border of the mandible and is usually below or slightly anterior­ to the 2 nd bicuspid tooth. The mental nerve divides under the depressor angulioris muscle into three main branches: one descends to the skin of chin, and the other two ascend to the skin and mucous membrane of lower lip and gingival. The branching pattern is variable however, and several finer branches may be noted. As the branches enter the lower lip, they become superficial­ and can usually be seen just beneath the mucosa of lower lip when it is everted.

Complications are few but include mental nerve damage and lip malposition, both of which are minimized with the use of proper technique.

To avoid injury to nerve during the operative procedure­, we have modified the normal vestibular incision.

  1. Make an incision through the mucosa in the vestibule. Between the canines the incision is made 10-15 mm away from the attached gingiva in a curvilinear fashion.
  2. Posterior to the canine the incision is only 5 mm away from the attached gingiva, staying superior to the mental nerve.
  3. Behind the 2 nd bicuspid, the incision line goes downward again at a level 10-15 mm away from attached gingival. Thus, making an inverted U-shaped cuff of mucosa around the mental nerve trunk in the bicuspid region [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
    Figure 1: Diagramatic representation of the incision line

    Click here to view
    Figure 2: Clinical picture of incision

    Click here to view
  4. Freeing of the mental nerve allows for better soft-tissue retraction. Tissue scissors are used to spread parallel to the nerve.
  5. Protect the mental nerve through Howarth Elevator which was placed firmly over the Bone.


Advantage of this incision is that it provides better exposure of lower border of mandible in the posterior body region with minimum trauma to the soft tissue. Also, the mucosal incisions are placed in the gingival buccal sulcus with enough soft tissue on the gingival side to allow easy closure.

The advantage of U-shaped mucosal cuff in the bicuspid region is that it provides better access and less injury to the mental nerve as it emerges from the mental foramen­ in this region, thus minimizing the post-surgical neurological­ complications.

 
   References Top

1.Chuong R, Donoff RB. Intraoral open reductaon of mandibular fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;14:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Dlerks EJ. Transoral approach to fractures of the mandible. Laryngoscope 1987;97:4-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Nishioka GJ, Sickels JE. Transoral plating of mandibular angle fractures: A techmque. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:531-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Raveh J, Vuillemin T, Ladrech K, Roux M, Sutter F. Plate osteosynthesis of 367 mandibular fractures: The unrestricted indication for intraoral approach. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:244-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Wald RM Jr, Abemayor E, Zemplenyi J, Mannai C, Lesavoy MA. The transoral treatment of mandibular fractures using noncompressionminiplates: A prospective study. Ann Plast Surg 1988;20:409-13.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Thaller SR. Management of mandibular fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:44-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Comparison of two incisions for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular body fractures: a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the surgical outcome
Sasikala Balasubramanian,Elavenil Panneerselvam,Gayathri Gopi,N. Komagan Prabhu,Aditi Rajendra Sharma,V.B. Krishnakumar Raja
Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1723    
    Printed82    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded489    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal